Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report with Review of literature
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Guided Interventions
Invited Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Original Article
Pictorial Review
Review Article
Technical Note
The Joint Effort: MSK Quiz
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report with Review of literature
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Guided Interventions
Invited Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Original Article
Pictorial Review
Review Article
Technical Note
The Joint Effort: MSK Quiz
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report with Review of literature
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Guided Interventions
Invited Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Original Article
Pictorial Review
Review Article
Technical Note
The Joint Effort: MSK Quiz
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

The Joint Effort: Msk Quiz
7 (
2
); 239-241
doi:
10.25259/IJMSR_1_2025

The joint effort: MSK quiz

Department of Radiology, Gujarat MRI Centre, Pvt., LTD., Samved Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Sushant Venugopal Bhat, Department of Radiology, Gujarat MRI Centre, Pvt., LTD., Samved Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. drsushantbhat@outlook.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Bhat SV, Patel D, Doctor M, Patel H. Focal fibrocartilaginous dysplasia: A rare entity in pediatric orthopedics. Indian J Musculoskelet Radiol. 2025;7:239-41. doi: 10.25259/IJMSR_1_2025

PART 1: QUESTIONS

A one-year old male child presented with bowing and shortening of the left lower limb. No history of trauma.

  1. What is the diagnosis?

  2. Give 2 imaging differential considerations.

  3. What is the most important differentiating feature amongst these entities

  4. What is the usual management?

(a) AP radiograph of bilateral lower limbs and (b) lateral radiograph of the left thigh showing a well-defined crescent-shaped cortical lucency without sclerosis along the medial cortex of distal meta-diaphysis of the left femur. AP: Anterior posterior
Figure 1:
(a) AP radiograph of bilateral lower limbs and (b) lateral radiograph of the left thigh showing a well-defined crescent-shaped cortical lucency without sclerosis along the medial cortex of distal meta-diaphysis of the left femur. AP: Anterior posterior
(a) T2-weighted (T2W) fat suppressed coronal, (b) T1-weighted (T1W) non-fat suppressed coronal, (c) T2W fat suppressed axial and (d) T1W non-fat suppressed axial non-fat suppressed axial images showing a well-defined T1 and T2 hypointense cortical lesion involving postero-medial aspect of dia-metaphyseal region of distal left femur causing medial angulation at this site and resultant bowing/varus deformity. No evident adjacent marrow edema is noted.
Figure 2:
(a) T2-weighted (T2W) fat suppressed coronal, (b) T1-weighted (T1W) non-fat suppressed coronal, (c) T2W fat suppressed axial and (d) T1W non-fat suppressed axial non-fat suppressed axial images showing a well-defined T1 and T2 hypointense cortical lesion involving postero-medial aspect of dia-metaphyseal region of distal left femur causing medial angulation at this site and resultant bowing/varus deformity. No evident adjacent marrow edema is noted.
(a) Computed tomography (CT) coronal reformat in bone window settings, (b) CT axial in bone window settings, and (c) CT axial image with soft-tissue window settings showing focal well-demarcated crescentic cortical defect at above site. No evident adjacent sclerosis.
Figure 3:
(a) Computed tomography (CT) coronal reformat in bone window settings, (b) CT axial in bone window settings, and (c) CT axial image with soft-tissue window settings showing focal well-demarcated crescentic cortical defect at above site. No evident adjacent sclerosis.

PART 2: ANSWERS

  1. Focal fibrocartilaginous dysplasia (FFCD)

  2. Fibrous cortical defect, cortical desmoid

  3. Presence of varus deformity associated with FFCD.

  4. Treatment is usually observation with a shoe elevation at medial aspect as the majority of lesions spontaneously resolve. Curettage or corrective osteotomy is only indicated when the deformity is persistent or progressive.

Findings

Radiograph AP and lateral view of thigh shows a well-defined crescent-shaped cortical defect without sclerosis along the medial cortex of distal meta-diaphysis of the left femur.

Magnetic resonance imaging reveals a well-defined T1/T2 hypointense cortical lesion involving posteromedial aspect of dia-metaphyseal region of distal left femur causing medial angulation at this site and resultant bowing/varus deformity.

Computed tomography confirms the presence of focal well-demarcated crescentic cortical defect at above site. No evident sclerosis.

Diagnosis

FFCD.

DISCUSSION

FFCD is rare, dysplastic disorder that generally affects the long bones in pediatric population and shows pathognomic radiographic appearance. The proximal tibia is the most frequently affected bone, followed by the distal femur, ulna, and proximal humerus.[1] The exact cause of FFCD is still unknown. It is suggested to be related to the failure of dedifferentiation of the mesenchymal anlage or trauma during delivery. This failure of dedifferentiation results in formation of excessive fibrocartilage resulting in a fibrous band or abnormal periosteal anchor in the metaphyseal bone and interferes with bone growth resulting in angulation limb deformity similar to that seen in epiphysiodesis.[2,3] Histology shows variable findings which include dense, fibrous, and tendon-like tissue to fibrocartilaginous tissue. The appearance of deformity typically begins around 12– 24 months when the child starts walking. Initially, the lesion is progressive; however, spontaneous improvement typically occurs around the age of 24 months due to the rupture of the lesion when the Levine/Drennan angle is <20°.[3-5] More serious malformation requires scraping to expedite the improvement. Pavone et al[6] found that up to 30° of correction can occur naturally without any intervention. Curettage or corrective osteotomy is only indicated when the deformity is persistent or progressive. The FFCD should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a cortically based lytic lesion associated with bone deformity in growing bone.

Ethical approval:

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Focal fibrocartilaginous dysplasia of the distal femur. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020;29:466-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Five additional cases of local fibrocartilaginous dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1997;6:52-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Tibia vara caused by focal fibrocartilaginous dysplasia. Three case reports. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:780-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Focal fibrocartilaginous dysplasia ("fibrous periosteal inclusion"): An additional series of eleven cases and literature review. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;14:75-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Tibia vara due to focal fibrocartilaginous dysplasia. The natural history. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:106-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . The natural history of focal fibrocartilaginous dysplasia in the young child with tibia vara. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24:579-86.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections